Quote:When every coach in the AFC south could lose their job I'd say there is turmoil.


And yes how we win is important. It's a measuring stick how far this team is away from the big game. A lot of players care about this as well. It's a pride thing. You want to beat the best by every means. Wins are great but they don't always tell the story how good your team is.

 

Do you even follow the NFL? I've yet to hear an NFL coach say "We refuse to play our next opponent, as they are not at full strength, and to be the best you have to play the best." There isn't a coach in the NFL who isn't happy to play a team which is at less than full strength. Their jobs depend on wins, not style points.

 

Do you truly believe the two best teams play in the Super Bowl? Get real. Your won-loss record usually depends on two things - injuries and the schedule (when you play them and what shape they are in.)

 

Funny how the "great" coaches tend to be the ones with the great quarterbacks, or the once-in-a-lifetime defense. Is Gary Kubiak all of a sudden a HOF coach? What about Marvin Lewis? Mike McCarthy takes a lot of hits, but his team is in the SB running every year.

 

Like quarterbacks, head coaches get too much credit when they win and too much blame when they lose. It's a team game - players and coaches.

 

This calling for Bradley's head seems to be a vain attempt by some to act as if they have a clue. Are we supposed to be impressed?

---