Quote:Okay, Bill Belichick started off with six wins as the Browns HC, and finished with .450% (close to 50/50) where as Gus is in his third year at .225% (20/80) not really the same...

in 2000 (his first year he went 5-11 sure but in his 2nd year he went 11-5, why because you cant find a QB tree & simply pluck one - ask Belichicks teacher Bill Parcells a thing he once said about finding QBs)...

Would Bill that great without Tom Brady -- probably not, but Bill is a Defensive minded HC people forget that because of Tom Brady's success...

without Tom he would probably run all the time....  as his teacher BIll Parcels never had that great of a QB...

but as a defensive minded HC he's teams D was always pretty good .. sure some years not the best but you can expect a tough defensive stragety against Bill... Parcells & Belichick..

 

many jaguar fans thought they might get that with Gus.. and after three years it hasnt shown... that is what is the most frustrating with Gus its not the 3 or 4 wins every year for 3 years.. its that the Defense stinks against the pass...

 

3 years and every year the Jaguars are last in INTs (and in fact the ones they do get usually are from the LBs!)

 

 

Bill would win without Tom. He went 11-5 with Matt Cassel when the AFC East was at it's strongest. My point wasn't to say that Gus is Bill, Jack, or Mike it was just that we call for the coaches head every single season and it's a bit annoying. I feel that we are building something, and I think that we are moving in the right direction. I know losses pilling up is exhausting, but I enjoyed the game v the Jets fully. We have more more to build with now than we have had in a while, and that to me is a nice silver lining. Tom Brady didn't make Bill, and if you think that you're just being silly.

---