The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Marshal Faulk Disrespect
|
Quote:I won't touch on every point... but I agree in regards to the coaching staff for Tenn holding some of the playbook back on Mariota. Throw out the first game against Tampa, and review all of his remaining games and its clear he has had to learn the fundamentals of playing under center and going through his reads. Also missing Wright and his RB also hurt in this game. Bortles was able to make a few throws to move the team down field, but their is a specific reason why I feel Fisch does not call passing plays inside of the 10. I feel ever since the Texan game where he threw a INT deep inside the redzone right before the half, I feel that shot his and the coaches confidence that Blake can make the .005 second read into the endzone with tight coverage. When it comes to redzone play, what I feel opposing teams have done is play the WR's and TE's on inside routes because of BB's poor ability to execute on fade patterns. Last week on the Hurns TD, there was a busted coverage. I wonder could Fisch call a pick/rub play to free Hurns or Robinson for a clear pass into the endzone. That would give him confidence. At the end of the day, personnel is what will define Bortles and Mariota's careers. If the OL is dominant and can create consistent passing lanes, the QB's can flourish. Cohesiveness with the WR's is also huge.
Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.