Quote:This reminds me of the Cardale Jones craze. Brock Osweiler had no career starts at the time people started saying Denver should give him the reins (pun intended). Like Jones, Osweiler only replaced the starter because of a severe injury. If Osweiler was the starter because of on-field performance, that change would have happened weeks ago.


Now I am not saying Osweiler sucks. Obviously he is a good quarterback in Gary Kubiak's system. But no matter how good a quarterback is, nobody should judge him based on only 10 quarters.

This is nothing like the Jones situation, college Is a complete different discussion. Brock was a good qb coming out of college and was labeled as a guy that would need some grooming before starting, which he has been doing for the last 3 and a half years under one of the greatest qbs of all time. While I agree u can't really say too much about a guy after only 2 starts, but Brock did a very good job, he also beat the patriots. On top of that peyton has had a terrible year and his arm looks very weak, looks like every throw is a lob pass. Denver also wants to do wats best for the future so why not continue to play your young qb. I do question how Brock will do in the play offs though, peyton probably sounds like a better option at this point only because of his playoff experience.

---