Quote:So as a structural engineer can you tell me that jet fuel does melt steel? Or explain how a building collapsing ob itself doesn't slow down at all? What about building 7? There's to many unanswered questions for me. I don't subscribe bush did it for the oil that's to simple but I do think we haven't got the whole story and at the very least parts of the federal government new something was about to happen and for whatever reason looked the other way.

I'm not an engineer but I work with waaaay too many of them to count over my 12 odd years in the industry as a BIM designer. Not a one has ever even hinted at thinking that they agree with any of the conspiracies as they pertain to our field.


Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel but as my previous reply says, its not necessary to melt steel for a collapse.


Edited to ad a portion of the previous link since I think it's relevant.


"With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom—approximately 10 stories—about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.


That added with the fire in building is plenty of reason to cause a collapse.

---