Quote:I never said we had a veteran team, so that's a strawman argument.


 

The problem with the team is the defense. The defense is not inexperienced in NFL terms. Teams rarely have a majority of players in their 5th year or more. Six of the Jags front seven (not including Marks) fit that category. So you then switch the argument from "experience" to "back up level players." If you want to argue player quality argue player quality, not "experience." But if you want to argue player quality, then the Jags defensive players are better than those of the Bears, Ravens, and Eagles, and probably several others, all of which have given up fewer points. And the Jags have played the easiest schedule in team history. We may never again face such a lucky confluence of opposing team woes.

I have no idea what sport you have been watching (sounds like college ball), but the good teams in the NFL do have a ton of starters with 5+ years of experience especially in key positions. Shocking the panthers are being led by a QB having the best season of his career in his <gasp> 5th year.

 

If you don't understand the difference between starting level talent and backup level, then you lack the capacity to be arguing football with a 1st grader. Sorry, that's just pathetic.

 

 

 

Strawman? Really? So we aren't veteran but we don't lack experience???? Do you even bother to read the stupid things you write? Do you even comprehend what a strawman argument is? LOL!

 

Quote:The Jags defense does not have a problem with limited experience.

---