Quote:1.  So tell us how ANY fan base would respond in the aftermath of blowing out a hated division rival?  Do you think Steelers fans, who support a team that has won six Super Bowls, somehow do not take glee in thumping the Browns?  Are Cowboys fans, who support a team that has won FIVE Super Bowls, somehow muted when they beat the Skins?  When the Patriots hand you your butts again, do they respond with a collective yawn? How should football fans respond to [BAD WORD REMOVED] slapping a division rival?  A soft polite golf clap?  Here's a clue:  when your team gets trounced by another-especially a division rival, and you go to that team's board, you are going to see some chest thumping and some not so nice things said about your team.  If you can't accept that, maybe message boards aren't for you.

 

2.  It's relevant to the conversation because YOU talked about fans not being accustomed to success.  You act as if all Colts fans have ever known is success.  They haven't.  Those of you who weren't Colts fans before Manning bandwagon hopped if you live outside Indy.   Maybe it applies to you...maybe not.  I can't tell due to all the bandwagon hoppers.

 

3.  Perhaps Pagano looks like a terrible coach because Grigson keeps handing him terrible players.  I mean it's kind of hard building a running game to support Luck when your GM trades first round picks for Trent Richardson.  It's kind of hard to stop the run consistently when you bypass stud DTs for diminutive WRs you don't need in the first round.  It's hard to play well down the stretch of the season when you sign blue hairs like Frank Gore and Andre Johnson.  We won't know for sure.  But he groused about not having an OL worth anything, and his words evidenced tension between he and the front office.  Question:  would YOU keep Grigson as GM?

 

1. We usually whip AFCS opponents on the regular and I just take it as another game, to be honest. And Patriots probably do yawn when they whip us because they've come accustomed to doing that under Pagano/Grigson.

 

2. Yeah let's go back 20 years!! VERY relevant to what's going on now! *[BAD WORD REMOVED] noise*. Also, doesn't pertain to me.

 

3. I'll put it this way: I'd fire both Pagano & Grigson, but I'm in the minority here and believe Pagano is more of a problem than Grigson. But to clarify, because I know you & everyone else will twist what I'm saying: I want BOTH fired.

 

 

EDIT: Wait, really? f(a)rt is a bad word on this board? LOL

---