Quote:Even if all he was hoping for was more carries, how'd that work out?


If a 2 yard average is decent in your eyes, there's little to discuss here.

Seriously? As if Yeldon has not had 2 YPC games? They are both average backs, they each have strong parts and each play a part.

Bringing up an old post after a player has an off game to prove your point that Robinson is not starting material, is a lame move.

You don't post when he has a good game, you come on and degrade him after one poor game with a fumble.

It's a tired old tactic to feed your ego, and while lots do it, I would expect more from you to lead the way in being rational.

Denard is a good back, he fumbled, let's hang him and forget all the other good things just so you can say you were right?

 

If I were coach I would play Robinson more, a lot more, Robinson offers a home run threat Yeldon does not have and hits the small holes our line opens harder and is faster to the outside than yeldon. So I take nothing back. He fumbled. All backs do it. It cost us but was not fatal, certainly Blakes INT was more harmful, should he be hung as well? Iif you want to make Yeldon "starter' fine, but I would split the carries.

So perhaps we can quit trying to make a point about our personnel evaluaton genuis and admit the truth, we have a couple of average backs and arguing which one is more average just to feed the ego is stupid. Play them both so we can have fresh legs on whichever average back is in there. I would definitely have Denard take more passes than Yeldon, he catches really well and is quicker on a fast screen.

---