Quote:I don't understand the "change for the sake of change" argument in regards to Bradley. Maybe you can elaborate why some think that?


Let me articulate my observation/stance on Bradley. Through nearly 3 seasons of observation, it seems clear to me that Bradley lacks the leadership necessary to be a good head coach. He is a VERY NICE guy and understand Xs and Os to some degree. However, it is a fact that not everyone can be or will be a successful head coach. The one thing we do know is that he is "positive." That's great. However, his approach has led to the Jags under-performing in almost every game for the talent level they have. Is he the sole source of their woes? Not at all. But at the end of the day, if you are Caldwell or Khan, you have to ask yourself, can this coach lead this franchise to a Super Bowl and win it (i.e. can he squeeze the most out of the roster the GM gets him)? The answer for me is clearly no.


Has there been some success that we should credit to him? Probably so. However, his "body of work" overall to me shows that he is not NFL HC caliber.


So, I know myself (and I would believe most others) do not want a HC change just for the sake of change. It is because season after season and week after week, there is continual evidence that Bradley is not a good HC. It's that simple.

Yes. I get it, I am not 100% behind gus bit I wanted to stay positive after such a loss that hurts a bit more seeing your playoff hopes dwindle. What I am saying is his Guus play hard and we are seeing results. If we can gus all I'm saying is it can be worse. Odds are you aren't hiring the next Bill Bellicheck(sp) and they guys love gus. I think as a coach he is progressing, we see it on his game management the last few weeks. I just trying to keep it positive, trust me, I know gus has been far from even average as far as w-l record or even game management goes but he himself is even getting better. He has 1 more year to prove it.

---