Quote:Like the nuance of forcing people onto a website that doesnt work based on a bill no one read?


What about blaming terrorism on a video? Blaming it on climate change? Yes yes. Thats tge type of sharp creased intilectualism that makes the world go round.


Ofcourse those blow hard billionaire international businessmen dont know anything about attention to detail.


The sad part is that the loudest people conplaining about nuance dont know the basic common law exceptions to the doctrine of jus soli, have no idea what glass stegal was, dont understand the establishment clause, dont know the details of barrack obamas legal career and think fannie mae is a blm activist.


In reality its the left that doesnt want to engage in robust reasoned debate on specific issues because based on the record they have plainly failed.


We have been pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy annually through fiscal policy trillions annually through easing monetary policy and had an effective zero funds rate for the better part of a decade. Suprise suprise we still dont have an economic utopia. That is the empirical failure of keynsian economics but the lefts only retort is "well at least were not meany pants" and trump is the one who lacks nuance?

The extent of this nuanced robust debate you refer to is saying baby body parts over and over until a crazy person murders people than acting shocked that your atone cold lies could have anything to do with motivating the rabble to commit acys of terrorist. Or basing your entire foreign policy on a single enemey and if we just the words radical Islam it will somehow make things better or "we win they lose". Or having the current leader in polling just telling you he's rich and that America is a bunch of sucky losers but he can fix it just like those companies of his he ran into bankruptcy.


If this is what you consider robust debate than its no surprise why the right tries to villify and ridicule acedemia. It makes perfect sense.


Nuance is understanding the difference between "carpet bombing" and strategic strikes and how one is an act of terrorism and the other is a more effectual way to deal with an enemy like isis. Or undersranding how saying we should be less concerned with killing innocents and presumably doing so if you were in charge leads to more coverts to extremism.

---