Quote:Certainly not all of Khan's decisions will end up being correct. The self-made thru business comment was just a lead up to counter the ridiculous "business 101" example we were given. I wasn't arguing right or wrong on the decision to keep Bradley. I was just pointing out a ridiculously oversimplified example, which it clearly is.


It's akin to going into a doctor's office and trying to give him/her a lesson on how to diagnose someone. Doctor's can be wrong, but a layperson painting an example for him/her of how to diagnose and/or treat someone and labeling it "diagnosis 101" would be silly even if that layperson happened to be right in that one instance. Who knows? Maybe Anchorman has an MBA and runs his own company. Even if that's true, it would still be silly to use an oversimplified "business 101" example to refute someone who quite frankly should already have your respect as a businessman.



Not only that, but the timing of releasing the statement about Bradley's future (which is what Anchorman was complaining about as shown above) is most certainly a business decision.

I didn't see this critique until just now at work.


I stand by my thoughts on khan. He seems like a good guy, and has done some smart business moves as our owner. The London games, while not popular with Jacksonville fans, was a sound business move.


But giving a vote of confidence, basically painting yourself into a corner, before the season is over is a dumb business move.


If you think I'm wrong, or my analogy of bad, please explain why you think that way.

---