I could provide a detailed response to this, but I would hate to "hijack" this thread with "race baiting" comments. I will point out the Daily Caller is Tucker Carlson's personal soapbox. And I find him to be about as repulsive, calculated and full of manure as just about anyone in political commentary. He knows where his bread is buttered and plays to that crowd. While there may be some historical accuracy to the blurb, I don't buy that a black student union led sit in at an abandoned building on an Ivy League campus is in the same universe as an armed takeover of a federal building. A student protest fighting for a space for black students to congregate on a predominantly white, elitist campus is not the same as an armed takeover to protest a prison sentence for arson or grazing rights on federal land. Even if a couple of the black students had weapons. The article does not say Holder was armed, but of course makes a point to say he has not responded to inquiries about it (which means he likely had ten bazookas).

---