Quote:I'll say basically what I've told everyone else. I'm alright with this. I would have been fine either way. I'm not a huge Pagano/Grigson fan, but I think the roster held up pretty well this year considering we had to play 5 different QBs in a season. FIVE. That's pretty absurd and still went 8-8.

 

With Pagano, the one thing that bothers me and has bothered me the last 4 years is the random (usually 2-3 a season) blowouts where the team looks completely unprepared. He needs to be more consistent. However, It's obvious that the players love playing for him.

Sorry I'm late to this particular discussion, but I would appreciate some clarification.

 

In December, when you and I went back and forth after the "fiddy burger" we put on you, you said this when I asked if you would retain Grigson:  http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/top.../?p=651969

 

Quote: 

3. I'll put it this way: I'd fire both Pagano & Grigson, but I'm in the minority here and believe Pagano is more of a problem than Grigson. But to clarify, because I know you & everyone else will twist what I'm saying: I want BOTH fired.

 

 

So what changed between mid-December and now to change your mind about firing both Grigson and Pagano?

 

How did you go from firing both with being okay with keeping both?  Am I twisting your words?

---