Quote: Why re-sign Henne over other qbs who give you a better chance to win?

That's the issue I have with all of this:


How do we know that to be actual fact? How can we positively say "those other backup QBs give you a better chance to win"? How is that true? How do any of those backup QBs give them a better chance to win? That cannot be stated as a fact.


We haven't seen Henne play since well before this new offensive lineup has developed over 2 seasons. How do we know he's going to be as terrible as what happened when he played with Shorts, Lewis, and a different/worse O-line?


I know it's not the popular opinion, but I personally think that Henne is one of the most solid backups in the entire league (comparing all backups,, not starters).


I don't wanna hear the "Osweiler" stuff. What do you think he would look like on this defensive-starved team? There'd be alot of losses still. Osweiler got benched last week. And he came REALLY close to blowing Denver's whole season. They were struggling and losing games too. If Denver's defense didn't step up in a HUGE way against Cincy,, Denver was in serious jeopardy of not even making the playoffs.



Anyway, strictly considering backups, I think Henne is one of the better ones. I wouldn't take Mettenberger, Mallett, Schaub, etc.. over him right now.


If Bortles goes down for any length of time, the Jags are screwed regardless. Stick with the guy who's been on the team for a while until salary actually becomes an issue.


**Keep Henne,, Draft a mid-late round QB to see if he can develop into the #2 QB after next season. I don't see the harm.

---