Quote:The deep "thinkers" on this board don't get it and never will.  It doesn't fit into their torch and pitchfork mental breakdown.

 

Extending this contract by 1 year is nothing more than a token move.  If they were truly committed to Bradley, the extension would have included multiple years, not 1. 

 

  In reality,   a one year extension for Gus Bradley is pocket change for Shad Khan.   It's a small cost of doing business in terms of attempting to maximize the Jaguars chances in 2016.  

 

  If the 2016 season doesn't go according to plan,  with the team off to another slow start,   it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Bradley was let go before the 2nd half of the season began.  

 

  Though I understand why some Jaguars fans aren't happy about the decision to extend Bradley's contract for a season,   I don't think there's a downside.    The alternative is a Chuck Pagano ' lame duck'  situation that was a major focal point of the Colts 2015 season.  

---