Quote:For the purposes of the post, I do not specifically absolve Bradley.

 

However, your logic here is baffling.

 

We were the worst team in football in 2012. This team was about as devoid of talent as you could find.

 

This team has had three drafts.  How many quality starters do you think a team starting at rock bottom should get per draft?

 

Does development factor into this at all?  Assuming, for argument's sake, a team starting at rock bottom should expect 7 new starters per draft, is it reasonable to expect all of these new starters to be able to contribute at a high level immediately, or is progression from the rookie season to subsequent seasons more likely?