Quote:For the purposes of the post, I do not specifically absolve Bradley.


However, your logic here is baffling.


We were the worst team in football in 2012. This team was about as devoid of talent as you could find.


This team has had three drafts. How many quality starters do you think a team starting at rock bottom should get per draft?


Does development factor into this at all? Assuming, for argument's sake, a team starting at rock bottom should expect 7 new starters per draft, is it reasonable to expect all of these new starters to be able to contribute at a high level immediately, or is progression from the rookie season to subsequent seasons more likely?

First of I want to say I truly enjoy reading your post but I have to ask why do you still try to make things make sense to people who just don't get it? We just watched Ted Ginn ball out last nigh and it took this man all of 9 years to look like a competent wideout. These guys think we are supposed to draft 5th and 6th rounds and they play like probowlers. They can't understand how bad this team was in 2012. They believe players like Bradon Marshall and Pot Roast would have carried us to the playoffs.



Just look at the teams playing in the super bowl. They have 1st and 2nd rounds who can't get pt and we're over here looking for starters in the 3 and 4 rounds still lol. I agree with you to the T. I just wish more here could understand what you are saying.

---