Quote:For the purposes of the post, I do not specifically absolve Bradley.


However, your logic here is baffling.


We were the worst team in football in 2012. This team was about as devoid of talent as you could find.


This team has had three drafts. How many quality starters do you think a team starting at rock bottom should get per draft?


Does development factor into this at all? Assuming, for argument's sake, a team starting at rock bottom should expect 7 new starters per draft, is it reasonable to expect all of these new starters to be able to contribute at a high level immediately, or is progression from the rookie season to subsequent seasons more likely?

Are you telling me Gus Bradley's only fault is that he hasn't had enough time? Not like bad personnel hiring, poor clock management, or inability to make halftime adjustments?


Talk about baffling.


We have had top draft picks, huge cap space, an owner willing to spend, pretty much anything a head coach needs to be successful.


I'm all for development, and realizes it takes time, but in year 3 of a rebuild,if you are getting destroyed by an easy schedule/ back up QBs, it's not development. Literally, the only thing that has developed ( the only thing that hasn't been a joke actually) are players named Blake, Allen, and Telvin. Everything else is a joke.


We had a brand new football team in 96 and only lost one more game than we did this year. Carolina had like 8 wins or something in their first season. Turning around a football team does take time, but seriously, besides the players I mentioned earlier, what has developed?



Dude got an extension and you know what his supporters had to say?


" it's not a big deal, it won't save him from being fired".


Yea. Awesome head coach.


BTW, what's keeping us from being the worst team in the league now? Is there a team we would play that would make you feel like victory was guaranteed?


Not me.

---