Quote:First of I want to say I truly enjoy reading your post but I have to ask why do you still try to make things make sense to people who just don't get it? We just watched Ted Ginn ball out last nigh and it took this man all of 9 years to look like a competent wideout. These guys think we are supposed to draft 5th and 6th rounds and they play like probowlers. They can't understand how bad this team was in 2012. They believe players like Bradon Marshall and Pot Roast would have carried us to the playoffs.



Just look at the teams playing in the super bowl. They have 1st and 2nd rounds who can't get pt and we're over here looking for starters in the 3 and 4 rounds still lol. I agree with you to the T. I just wish more here could understand what you are saying.

Thanks for the kind words about my posts.

 

There are several ways I can answer your question. 

 

Some would suggest I am a glutton for punishment.  Some would suggest I am slow, or just plain stubborn.

 

I think it's a combination of factors.  I absolutely love football and I love discussing/debating it.  I like the idea of being able to convince someone to at least question their logic and challenge their paradigms.  Not only that, I think some of the best and most interesting message board discussions involve topics that foster disagreement.  Though I often feel strongly about the principles I advance here, strong conviction is not necessarily a driving force.  Sometimes, I have a problem with a poster's logic/reasoning, but not necessarily with the conclusion.

 

In this part of the thread, I can understand Joe's sentiment that Bradley's record is unacceptable to most football fans and under most circumstances.  I do NOT, however, think he was being particularly reasonable in his rationale for reaching his conclusion, which is why I asked him the questions I did.

---