Quote:Spoiler below:

 

 

 

 

By the end of the show I felt comfortable thinking that Steven Avery did indeed commit the crime. I of course googled a lot more information than just what the documentary provided. I do also believe the cops had a hand in staging 'some' of the evidence, but I think he did it.

 

As for the kid, whether he was involved or not, he did not have a fair trial. The way they treated him and coerced him into admitting things that may or may not be true was horrific. He needs a new trial for sure. Throw out that garbage statement and those stupid drawings and give the kid his due.

On SA's part the thing that grinds my gears whether he's guilty or not is the unprofessional way in which the LEO's conducted it all, as well as pretty much anyone for the state. Things just seemed too convenient in many areas. If he's guilty let the evidence prove it. Don't make things happen to fit the outcome they wanted. They all looked guilty of collusion.


And BD's first attorney and investigator working with the prosecution? Fresh hell.

---