Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

git'er_done
Journeyman
Posts: 1,606
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 0

#40

02-05-2016, 11:58 PM

Quote:Hurns has 1 year left on his deal and then he is a RFA. The numbers I threw out will probably be much closer than the 5M you threw out. If I was Hurns' agent, I would probably hang up on you.

Do you think there's any chance the team doesn't keep him after 2016? Does restricted free agency pose some difficult hurdle that I'm not aware of? No. So 2016 and 2017 - that's 2 years, like I said. $5 million a year would mean a $4.5 million raise in 2016 and another $2.5 million raise over what I imagine will be a 2nd round tender when he hits restricted free agency (Tashaun Gipson got that and he was a UDFA as well). Maybe he gets a bit more than $5 mill but I just don't see how Nelson gets $8 mill, when he's closer to free agency, and, you know, umm, better - but you think Hurns will get $10 mill after 2 years in the league. As I said, the whole point of this deal is to sign a guy for less than market value. A bird in the hand...

Messages In This Thread

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 01:26 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 01:37 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Guest - 02-05-2016, 01:52 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 02:50 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by GlockBortles - 02-05-2016, 03:08 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by scoobydiesel - 02-05-2016, 03:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 06:47 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-05-2016, 07:33 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-05-2016, 07:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by C'MON JAGS - 02-05-2016, 08:13 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 08:51 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 09:05 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by BklynJag - 02-05-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 11:00 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 11:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-05-2016, 12:04 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 12:11 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 12:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by SpeedyG - 02-05-2016, 12:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JaG4LyFe - 02-05-2016, 01:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Kane - 02-05-2016, 01:42 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Byron LeftTown - 02-05-2016, 01:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 02:10 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by TravC59 - 02-05-2016, 02:24 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFerLife - 02-05-2016, 02:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 03:46 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Sosa - 02-05-2016, 04:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Teal Curtain - 02-05-2016, 04:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:14 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 04:26 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by haveaseat - 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by WingerDinger - 02-05-2016, 05:40 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 05:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 06:08 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-05-2016, 10:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 11:36 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 11:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-06-2016, 05:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 07:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-06-2016, 09:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Donald Coleson - 02-06-2016, 06:29 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 07:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-06-2016, 11:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-07-2016, 12:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaguarmvp - 02-07-2016, 05:38 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:30 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:32 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NacD - 02-08-2016, 03:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-08-2016, 03:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by J-Mizzal - 02-08-2016, 04:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-08-2016, 06:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-13-2016, 12:51 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFanClubOfMD - 02-13-2016, 01:41 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-15-2016, 10:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 10:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 12:06 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 01:35 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 01:56 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-15-2016, 02:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 02:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MikePete54 - 02-15-2016, 03:20 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-15-2016, 03:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 04:53 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-15-2016, 07:55 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-16-2016, 02:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 08:18 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ThatsGoodJaguars - 02-17-2016, 08:21 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-17-2016, 08:35 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-17-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jagwired - 02-17-2016, 10:07 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-17-2016, 10:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 10:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by knarnn - 02-18-2016, 10:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-20-2016, 09:06 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-20-2016, 10:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-20-2016, 10:22 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-22-2016, 09:16 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by pirkster - 02-24-2016, 12:12 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NYC4jags - 02-25-2016, 11:56 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-25-2016, 02:21 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jagforlife85 - 02-25-2016, 02:27 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by AP06 - 02-25-2016, 02:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-06-2016, 08:05 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.