Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The College Game Who would you take if we can get a trade back and Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack and Bosa are off the board?


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Poll: Who would you take if we can get a trade back and Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack and Bosa are off the board?
Buckner
Hargreaves
Lawson
Other
[Show Results]
 
 
Who would you take if we can get a trade back and Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack and Bosa are off the board?

  • Offline MalabarJag
    Pet Sitter

  • ******
  • Posts: 5,972
    Threads: 46
    Joined: Mar 2001
    Reputation: 112
#29
04-01-2016, 12:07 AM

Quote:By the way, one point I omitted in my response to you.

 

When Dallas took Steve Walsh, costing them the #1 overall pick in 1990, it precluded them from taking Hall of Fame DT Cortez Kennedy, who would have been the likely choice since he played under Jimmy Johnson at Miami and played in the same scheme.

 

Who would taking Wentz or whatever QB at 5 preclude us from taking?

 

I guess we can't use help this year at other positions.
 

First off, Walsh was not a franchise QB and JJ made a big mistake. The assumption by me is that Wentz is a franchise QB as good as the pundits say he is. Obviously if Caldwell thinks Wentz is the next Jake Locker then this would never happen. In my personal opinion I think Cardale Jones is the QB with the highest ceiling in this draft, but the assumption here has to be that Wentz is the most tradeable.


 

As far as who we miss out on, from my point of view selecting and then trading Wentz is equivalent to trading down. It just gives Caldwell more time to negotiate. I don't see any compelling player to take instead. Buckner is the only elite prospect left, and no, we can't use help at 3T with Jackson and Marks already here. I don't think Hargreaves is significantly better than one of the other CBs who'll be available at (say) the Rams pick. I'd rather take a chance on Spence than take Lawson, especially if we had another 2nd round pick as a bonus.




                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Who would you take if we can get a trade back and Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack and Bosa are off the board? - by MalabarJag - 04-01-2016, 12:07 AM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!