Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

JackCity
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13,525
Threads: 168
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 173

#66

02-15-2016, 10:02 AM

Quote:What about the others like, Sergio Brown, Toby Gerhart, Zane Beadles, Dekota Watson? Chris Clemons gave you one ok season but this year was trash. What have they improved on this team manning starting spots? And get outta here with Dan Skuta. He's on the list of nobody's cashing checks too. My comment wasn't about the cap actually, it was about their drafting the past few years and getting quality players. Clearly what they've been drafting put them in a position to not spend on duds like we've been these last two years in free agency. Yeah they'll have to make some moves this off season but guess who else does too? Like I said in a division with the league champs and another playoff team they are doing a better job at building a team at this point.

Still don't understand why people expected so much from guys like Sergio Brown,Dekoda Watson,Toby Gerhart,Ziggy Hood etc etc

Zane Beadles was a let down though I'll agree on that.

Messages In This Thread

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 01:26 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 01:37 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Guest - 02-05-2016, 01:52 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 02:50 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by GlockBortles - 02-05-2016, 03:08 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by scoobydiesel - 02-05-2016, 03:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 06:47 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-05-2016, 07:33 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-05-2016, 07:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by C'MON JAGS - 02-05-2016, 08:13 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 08:51 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 09:05 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by BklynJag - 02-05-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 11:00 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 11:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-05-2016, 12:04 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 12:11 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 12:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by SpeedyG - 02-05-2016, 12:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JaG4LyFe - 02-05-2016, 01:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Kane - 02-05-2016, 01:42 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Byron LeftTown - 02-05-2016, 01:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 02:10 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by TravC59 - 02-05-2016, 02:24 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFerLife - 02-05-2016, 02:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 03:46 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Sosa - 02-05-2016, 04:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Teal Curtain - 02-05-2016, 04:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:14 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 04:26 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by haveaseat - 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by WingerDinger - 02-05-2016, 05:40 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 05:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 06:08 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-05-2016, 10:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 11:36 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 11:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-06-2016, 05:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 07:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-06-2016, 09:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Donald Coleson - 02-06-2016, 06:29 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 07:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-06-2016, 11:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-07-2016, 12:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaguarmvp - 02-07-2016, 05:38 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:30 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:32 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NacD - 02-08-2016, 03:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-08-2016, 03:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by J-Mizzal - 02-08-2016, 04:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-08-2016, 06:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-13-2016, 12:51 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFanClubOfMD - 02-13-2016, 01:41 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-15-2016, 10:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 10:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 12:06 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 01:35 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 01:56 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-15-2016, 02:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 02:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MikePete54 - 02-15-2016, 03:20 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-15-2016, 03:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 04:53 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-15-2016, 07:55 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-16-2016, 02:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 08:18 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ThatsGoodJaguars - 02-17-2016, 08:21 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-17-2016, 08:35 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-17-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jagwired - 02-17-2016, 10:07 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-17-2016, 10:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 10:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by knarnn - 02-18-2016, 10:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-20-2016, 09:06 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-20-2016, 10:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-20-2016, 10:22 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-22-2016, 09:16 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by pirkster - 02-24-2016, 12:12 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NYC4jags - 02-25-2016, 11:56 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-25-2016, 02:21 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jagforlife85 - 02-25-2016, 02:27 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by AP06 - 02-25-2016, 02:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-06-2016, 08:05 PM

Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.