Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

ThatsGoodJaguars
Rookie
Posts: 802
Threads: 57
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 0

#80

02-17-2016, 08:21 AM

Quote:http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/story...7617181608

"SAN FRANCISCO (AP) The Oakland Raiders and Jacksonville Jaguars are the only two NFL teams below the 89 percent cash spending required by next year, and they are significantly under the minimum, the players' union said Thursday.

NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith singled out the Oakland Raiders as being $41 million below the spending floor they must reach by March 2017. The Jacksonville Jaguars are $28 million short of the collectively bargained requirements, Smith added."

"Early last month, Jaguars general manager Dave Caldwell said: "The philosophy is you've got to look, at least for us, not this year but next year. We have some very key guys on our team that are going to be free agents or going to be in their third year and able to redo their contracts."

===========================================================

Okay, what Dave said sounds logical, however, as I understand it, by rule we cannot do contract extensions for the 2014 draft class (Blake, Telvin, Allan Robinson) until March 2017, but also by rule, we have to reach minimum spending levels by March 2017. At 12:00 AM, March 1, 2017, we get penalized, but we can't sign Blake's extension until 12:00 AM, March 1, 2017. I don't see how we can beat the clock on the penalty by extending current players. Because outside of our 2014 draft class, whose extension would use up any significant amount of cash?

But we can always extend Luke Joeckel!

"It was Blake Bortles the whole time. They believe in this kid. He reminds me a bit of a young Ben Roethlisberger." ~Mike Mayock

Messages In This Thread

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 01:26 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 01:37 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Guest - 02-05-2016, 01:52 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 02:50 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by GlockBortles - 02-05-2016, 03:08 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by scoobydiesel - 02-05-2016, 03:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 06:47 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-05-2016, 07:33 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-05-2016, 07:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by C'MON JAGS - 02-05-2016, 08:13 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 08:51 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 09:05 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by BklynJag - 02-05-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 11:00 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 11:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-05-2016, 12:04 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 12:11 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 12:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by SpeedyG - 02-05-2016, 12:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JaG4LyFe - 02-05-2016, 01:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Kane - 02-05-2016, 01:42 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Byron LeftTown - 02-05-2016, 01:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 02:10 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by TravC59 - 02-05-2016, 02:24 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFerLife - 02-05-2016, 02:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 03:46 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Sosa - 02-05-2016, 04:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Teal Curtain - 02-05-2016, 04:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:14 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 04:26 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by haveaseat - 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by WingerDinger - 02-05-2016, 05:40 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 05:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 06:08 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-05-2016, 10:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 11:36 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 11:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-06-2016, 05:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 07:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-06-2016, 09:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Donald Coleson - 02-06-2016, 06:29 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 07:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-06-2016, 11:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-07-2016, 12:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaguarmvp - 02-07-2016, 05:38 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:30 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:32 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NacD - 02-08-2016, 03:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-08-2016, 03:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by J-Mizzal - 02-08-2016, 04:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-08-2016, 06:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-13-2016, 12:51 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFanClubOfMD - 02-13-2016, 01:41 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-15-2016, 10:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 10:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 12:06 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 01:35 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 01:56 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-15-2016, 02:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 02:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MikePete54 - 02-15-2016, 03:20 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-15-2016, 03:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 04:53 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-15-2016, 07:55 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-16-2016, 02:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 08:18 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ThatsGoodJaguars - 02-17-2016, 08:21 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-17-2016, 08:35 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-17-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jagwired - 02-17-2016, 10:07 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-17-2016, 10:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 10:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by knarnn - 02-18-2016, 10:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-20-2016, 09:06 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-20-2016, 10:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-20-2016, 10:22 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-22-2016, 09:16 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by pirkster - 02-24-2016, 12:12 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NYC4jags - 02-25-2016, 11:56 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-25-2016, 02:21 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jagforlife85 - 02-25-2016, 02:27 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by AP06 - 02-25-2016, 02:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-06-2016, 08:05 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.