Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year

jagforlife85
Veteran
Posts: 3,770
Threads: 257
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 11

#94

02-25-2016, 02:27 PM

Quote:Am I correct in reading this "carryover number" policy to mean we are required to spend 89% of this figure?

<b>Club: Carryover Amount</b>

» Arizona Cardinals<span style="color:rgb(34,34,33);font-family:arial, verdana, helvetica;">: $3,031,663
» Atlanta Falcons: $3,905,771
» Baltimore Ravens: $1,633,944
» Buffalo Bills: $4,467,331
» Carolina Panthers: $3,731,200
» Chicago Bears: $867,589
» Cincinnati Bengals: $7,587,902
» Cleveland Browns: $20,734,144
» Dallas Cowboys: $3,571,239
» Denver Broncos: $3,300,000
» Detroit Lions: $862,191
» Green Bay Packers: $6,953,847
» Houston Texans: $1,637,055
» Indianapolis Colts: $4,950,629
»

Jacksonville Jaguars
: $32,774,928

» Kansas City Chiefs: $2,622,838
» Los Angeles Rams: $933,521
» Miami Dolphins: $9,137,544
» Minnesota Vikings: $2,090,409
» New England Patriots: $1,347,882
» New Orleans Saints: $1,400,000
» New York Giants: $11,193,231
» New York Jets: $2,484,216
» Oakland Raiders: $13,373,617
» Philadelphia Eagles: $7,255,362
» Pittsburgh Steelers: $3,000,327
» San Diego Chargers: $2,287,176
» San Francisco 49ers: $12,206,686
» Seattle Seahawks: $11,587
» Tampa Bay Buccaneers: $7,987,748
» Tennessee Titans: $20,783,801
» Washington Redskins: $5,837,734</span>

These are the latest figures ^ according to NFLPA:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...d-by-nflpa

Caldwell must be licking his chops for this FA period to start.

You bet, agents are looking their chops as well. You better believe that the agent representatives for guys like Olivier Vernon, Malik Jackson, Eric Berry etc.. have had active discussions with their clients in regards to the teams with the most cap space, especially the up and coming teams like the Jags & Raiders. The Jags have a significant advantage over the Raiders in the terms of state income taxes.

Messages In This Thread

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 01:26 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 01:37 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Guest - 02-05-2016, 01:52 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 02:50 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by GlockBortles - 02-05-2016, 03:08 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by scoobydiesel - 02-05-2016, 03:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 06:47 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-05-2016, 07:33 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-05-2016, 07:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by C'MON JAGS - 02-05-2016, 08:13 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-05-2016, 08:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 08:51 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 09:05 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by BklynJag - 02-05-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-05-2016, 11:00 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Haterade - 02-05-2016, 11:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-05-2016, 12:04 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-05-2016, 12:11 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 12:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by SpeedyG - 02-05-2016, 12:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JaG4LyFe - 02-05-2016, 01:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Kane - 02-05-2016, 01:42 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Byron LeftTown - 02-05-2016, 01:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 02:10 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by TravC59 - 02-05-2016, 02:24 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFerLife - 02-05-2016, 02:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 03:46 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Sosa - 02-05-2016, 04:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Teal Curtain - 02-05-2016, 04:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:14 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 04:16 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-05-2016, 04:26 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by haveaseat - 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by WingerDinger - 02-05-2016, 05:40 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 05:45 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Tuxedo - 02-05-2016, 06:08 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-05-2016, 10:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-05-2016, 11:36 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-05-2016, 11:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MarleyJag - 02-06-2016, 05:59 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 07:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by HolsterHusto - 02-06-2016, 09:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-06-2016, 09:27 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Donald Coleson - 02-06-2016, 06:29 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:54 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 06:58 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-06-2016, 07:05 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-06-2016, 11:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by git'er_done - 02-07-2016, 12:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaguarmvp - 02-07-2016, 05:38 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:30 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by chrisjohns726 - 02-08-2016, 02:32 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NacD - 02-08-2016, 03:00 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jaxjags625 - 02-08-2016, 03:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by J-Mizzal - 02-08-2016, 04:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-08-2016, 06:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:47 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-08-2016, 08:59 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-13-2016, 12:51 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagsFanClubOfMD - 02-13-2016, 01:41 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:38 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by P. Haze - 02-15-2016, 01:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JackCity - 02-15-2016, 10:02 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 10:58 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 12:06 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 01:35 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Cleatwood - 02-15-2016, 01:56 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-15-2016, 02:12 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 02:50 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by MikePete54 - 02-15-2016, 03:20 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-15-2016, 03:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by JagFanFirst - 02-15-2016, 04:53 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-15-2016, 07:55 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flgatorsandjags - 02-16-2016, 02:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 08:18 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ThatsGoodJaguars - 02-17-2016, 08:21 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by ATLjag - 02-17-2016, 08:35 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-17-2016, 08:36 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jagwired - 02-17-2016, 10:07 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by flsprtsgod - 02-17-2016, 10:09 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-17-2016, 10:40 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by knarnn - 02-18-2016, 10:33 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-20-2016, 09:06 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by The Real Marty - 02-20-2016, 10:20 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by imtheblkranger - 02-20-2016, 10:22 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by FBT - 02-22-2016, 09:16 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by pirkster - 02-24-2016, 12:12 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by NYC4jags - 02-25-2016, 11:56 AM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by Jags02 - 02-25-2016, 02:21 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by jagforlife85 - 02-25-2016, 02:27 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by AP06 - 02-25-2016, 02:52 PM

Jags significantly under the minimum 89 percent cash spending required by next year - by leopold332002 - 02-06-2016, 08:05 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!

Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.