Quote:So in other words... say what you think that people want to hear, even if it's not what you believe or stand for just to win an election.  That pretty much sums up what Donald Trump (as well as a few other candidates) is all about.  Here is just one example.

 

"We are going to deport them all, build a wall and make Mexico pay for it".  

 

Never mind that it's not only impossible to do, but also the fact that no President has the power to enact and enforce such "policy".  Simply say what you think people want to hear just to win the election.

 

"We are going to get rid of the lines around the states.  There will be many great plans and people will love it.  Also negotiate a better deal with the pharmaceutical companies".  Again, just say what you think people want to hear just to win an election.  No President "negotiates deals" because it's actually Congress that holds and spends the money.

 

Your entire argument can be used against every single candidate who claims they want to do something. Every single one of them are making claims of what they will do, but every single one of those claims will have to go through congress. So what is your point? Should every candidate add "with the approval of congress" after they speak about their policies and positions? You are trying to make a case against Donald Trump but actually made a case for all of them. Should we just throw away the position of President and only have congress? After all, they are the only ones who make things happen.

 

As for inability to deport illegal immigrants and construct a border wall, I want you to give me exact details on why it is impossible. I want you to explain how we can somehow put a man on the moon, develop advanced particle accelerators, field the worlds largest military ever in existence, deconstruct and rebuild the human genome, but somehow can't kick 11 million criminals out and put up a 400 mile wall.

---