Quote:Not an anarchist, more voluntarism. Bottom line the bigger any social contract or form of government gets I oppose. I'm even fine with socialism if you have it on a small localized scale and it's what those people chose to live by. That's why it works in some smaller countries but is completely unsustainable here. 

 

Democracy is a mob rule society, the mob is often wrong. The mob supported segregation, slavery, women's suffrage, wealth redistribution, and anything else so long as they benefit in some way. It's more important to protect the rights of the one over the will of many. I'm always against wealth redistribution which is why I have a disdain for democracy as it's the easiest way for a large sector to vote the power to confiscate and distribute the wealth of others. 

 

You need a social contract keep it as simple as protect individual property rights, and protect the lives of innocents.

 

the executive branch is eroding our property rights through regulations and the lives of the innocent were cancelled out by five of the most educated people to ever set foot in this great land.  

 

Representative government is only as good as the representatives.  The greater design of our constitutional republic is that power should be splintered between the three branches of government and the people who elect their representatives through a redundant set of checks and balances.  When you have an unelected oligarchy conspiring to fundamentally usurp the ability of the people to voice their assent or decent, or in this case deny them the basic right to be the authors of the authority given to their representatives, then this is a fundamental bastardization of representative government replacing it with the Tyranny of the few!

---