Quote:You're missing my point. I'm not disagreeing that he's a lower tier qb. I'm saying, by the numbers only, he could be considered "good" depending on what your definition is.


Before his last ACL he had 14tds to 4 ints. That's pretty good.

 

You're missing my point and the point of the article, Sam Bradford isn't good, at all. I don't care what his numbers are. He's a certified bust that has inexplicably collected $100M from two NFL franchises, both of which had to mortgage their futures to trade up in this years draft to the correct the mistake in investing draft capital in Sam Bradford. He has no right to be "mad" given the situation, does Sam Bradford honestly think he's played well? If he does then I want what he's smoking, at the end of the day he needs to look himself i the mirror and realize he's fortunate to be in this situation, how many certified bust have collected $100M? He'll obviously start for Phly this year because Wentz isn't ready to play, if Bradford plays well he'll likely get a nice contract next year, have enough confidence to bet on yourself and be thankful for the opportunity and monies Phly has invested in you.

---