Quote:We express concern that this may give straight anatomical men who, sincerely or not, identify or dress as a woman improper access to what should be safe places for women. You linked to an article with 25 instances of men being in bathrooms. ONE [BAD WORD REMOVED] INCIDENT of a male dressing up as a woman. He was a predator trying to be slick. Newsflash.. peeping Toms and unsavory men have been doing stuff like this since long before you were born. Using that as a keystone to your argument proves how weak a foundation your argument is built upon. Again.. the article YOU linked to, you did not even read. ONE incident of a dude dressed up as a woman. That one guy, a documented predator, has you [BAD WORD REMOVED] petrified.



You say were crazy fear mongerers and that could never happen. I didn't say it couldn't. I said it doesn't. Not on any scale which would cause public risk or alarm. One dude with bad intentions who was not slick and got caught. If you are allowing that one guy to incite irrational levels of fear, you are paranoid.



You are then presented with examples of straight anatomical men who, sincerely or not, dressed or identified as women and abused improper access to women's facilities and violated their privacy. You presented ONE incident of a straight guy who had bad intentions and it was all it took for your imagination to create a [BAD WORD REMOVED] army of them. If this was an epidemic, I assure you it would be all over the news every day. It isn't. This entire facet of your argument is bunk. It is NOT happening on a grand scale or a small scale. It was attempted ONE time per your own documented link from [BAD WORD REMOVED] Breitbart.



Your response is. Well those aren't REAL trans people. They are just <del>individuals</del> an individual (FIFY)
who (as we predicted) abused improper access to women's facilities and abused their privacy. You even went on to say, well what do you expect the guy was a predator. You don't even stop to think that the policy you advocate gave the predator access to the restroom to begin with. Once upon a time, I didn't know you were an absolute troll.. I offered to meet you face to face to give you an honest education on a subject you are clearly out of your element on. You gave me some "I'm alright bro" type response. You can use Google to look up the difference between transgender, transvestite, cross dresser, sexual predator and pedophile, but you may have to do actual leg work to learn the difference. (but I am quite sure you won't). Hell.. you won't even read any of this response. You propose discriminating against an entire demographic because of this one guy. That is absurd.



I can engage in a reasoned cost risk analysis. I know there are a lot of people just looking for a safe place to relieve themselves. I may disagree with their lifestyle choice but I don't have to dismiss their concerns out of hand. Your "cost risk analysis" deems this ONE person to outweighs the liberties of the entire trans population. How is that reasoned? You're reaching...



You on the otherhand only care about calling someone a fearmonger homophone trandaphobe and can't acknowledge the potential abused of the system you advocate. That's real zealotry. I never called you a fear monger. I said you are allowing the fear machine (via that article you linked to) to plant irrational fears in your head. I acknowledged that ONE guy was trying to be clever by taking advantage of what is trying to be done for trans people. Will you acknowledge that what that guy tried to do IS NOT HAPPENING ON ANY LEVEL ANYWHERE? No.. of course you won't. You are a troll. You will respond to this post with some retort that does not reference any of what I have said. Or some cryptic one liner that only you understand.