Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Jaguars are not a laughing stock

#19
(This post was last modified: 04-30-2016, 11:27 PM by JaguarsWoman.)

Chad Reuter graded each day of the draft for all 32 teams. This is what he wrote about our draft:

 

Quote:<b>Jacksonville Jaguars</b> 
<b>Draft picks:</b> Jalen Ramsey (No. 5 overall), Myles Jack (No. 36 overall), Yannick Ngakoue(No. 69 overall), Sheldon Day (No. 103 overall), Tyrone Holmes (No. 181 overall), Branden Allen (No. 201 overall), Jonathan Woodard (No. 226 overall) 
<b>Day 1 grade:</b> A 
<b>Day 2 grade:</b> A 
<b>Day 3 grade:</b> A 
<b>Overall grade:</b> A 
<b>The skinny:</b> The Jags needed a defensive playmaker and they got the top player on many teams' boards. His fit as a tall, long corner is perfect for Gus Bradley's system. Apparently, the Jaguars' doctors didn't have an issue with Jack's injury. If he gets back on the field, this will be an amazing bargain. Giving up pick No. 146 was worth it. Ngakoue is a pure pass rusher that will benefit from being used in subpackage to start his career. 

Day provides energy into the defensive line despite his lack of size. Holmes was a very productive FCS-level player. It was shocking that Allen wasn't picked in the fourth or fifth rounds, so Jacksonville got a steal. Woodard's been on the radar for quite a while and is a late-round version of Malik Jackson.
 

I think he should have given us an A+ for Day 1.


Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by David Tse - 04-30-2016, 10:03 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by RealJagsFan - 04-30-2016, 10:58 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by NCJag - 04-30-2016, 11:43 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by carlo - 04-30-2016, 12:41 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by carlo - 04-30-2016, 12:41 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by ColoJag - 04-30-2016, 09:00 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JackCity - 04-30-2016, 09:07 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by DuvalJag - 04-30-2016, 09:09 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by MarleyJag - 04-30-2016, 09:31 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JaguarsWoman - 04-30-2016, 11:26 PM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JagJohn - 05-01-2016, 08:20 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JagJohn - 05-01-2016, 08:40 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by SeldomRite - 05-01-2016, 08:43 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JagJohn - 05-01-2016, 08:43 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JagJohn - 05-01-2016, 08:48 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by rfc17 - 05-01-2016, 08:52 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by JagJohn - 05-01-2016, 08:53 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by SeldomRite - 05-01-2016, 08:55 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by StitchJones - 05-01-2016, 08:56 AM
Jaguars are not a laughing stock - by Kotite - 08-30-2016, 07:51 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!