Quote:You've chosen your own set of facts and ignored all others as you always do.

 

In your premise #3, you are implying that Bradley is a "successful" defensive minded coach.  Most have assumed that he is responsible for the success of the Seattle Defense.  However, the facts are they they further improved after he left.  It's also just as plausible (and more likely) that Pete Carroll and John Schneider are responsible for their success.

 

There are no facts yet (going into his 4th year as our HC) to support that success has followed Bradley. 

 

All of your speculations are ignorant and devoid of any objectivity whatsoever. 

 

Most here are rather objective and at a minimum understand that it's time for Bradley to put up or shut up.  Many believe that he has shown enough that he will not be successful as an NFL HC and is past his tenure.  And then a very few (you) believe that he should rival Belichik for coach of the year.

 

If you're going to debate/discuss here, at least bring some legitimate rationale, logic, facts and objectivity.

ehh, i agree with part of your assessment about his time in Seattle but not completely. the legion of boom was born while bradley was there and it is hard for me argue they have actually gotten better since he left. i think they are elite, but i think alot of it comes from the players not the coaching personnel. when cam sat out the beginning of last year, that D looked a whole lot weaker than they had in the past. If coaching was  truly the factor that made them what they are, then cam's absence should not have effected them that much. I'm not saying bradley is the only reason they are what they are, but i am saying carroll and Schneider are not more of an influence than him. There may be weaker personnel groups who out performed our D last year, but i can't name them. our D was pretty atrocious. I mean we started Josh Evans, thats enough for me. 

 

and i dont believe he deserves coach of the year, i just don't think what has done has warranted all the scrutiny he receives. It would have been one thing if Ron Rivera got fired and he took over Carolina, a team that doesnt have to completely purge thier roster, but still managed to go 2-14. It's a little different when you take over a team that 3 years into being there, you only have 3/53 existing player from before you got there. he may as well have taken over a expansion team. 

---