Quote:Gosh darn it. I was looking forward to a calm reasoned discussion and you had to say this.


1.) I do not condone random acts of violence against anyone, trans gay straight liberal conservative whatever. I think that we should be allowed to express our ideas and live in peace with all men. That's a basic tenant of the social contract.


2.) The idea that ANYONE would take the behavior of a two year old and subject that child to their post modern pseudo intellectual social engineering is a fundamental abomination. Kids are kids. they shouldn't be mixed up in this. Full mental development doesn't occur until the mid 20's. adult hormones don't start till they are two. The idea that you would cede the kind of cost risk analysis needed to undertake that kind of lifestyle choice to a two year old is ridiculous. To quote the senator "We have gone stark raving mad."


As was stated before that you never acknowledged, we have developed a culture so perverse and so opposed to judging someone's TRUTH that when a sick woman went to a doctor claiming to be TRAN ABLED (Trans Blind) the doctor helped her poor drano into her eyes so that she could liver her TRUTH! Is that the kind of society you want to build. What if a young child identifies as a predator. Some show signs of necrophylia for their time of birth. Dahmer was playing with the remains of dead animals when other little kids were playing with trucks. When he became an adult he could only achieve arousal in the company of men that were dead or mutilated. he was BORN THAT WAY. Are we to condemn such a person to a life of bad sex? As a society are we bound to do whatever makes him feel comfortable? Should we subsidize the tenderizer he uses to soften the human flesh that he needs to consume?


Well that's an extreme example right? The concept of a biologically male person thinking and believing they are female is extreme. In both instances the urges and compulsions are inbread. Does that make them inherently right?


The failure of secular progressivism is the fundamental inability to separate itself from the fundamental premise that all NATURAL URGES are healthy and that its societies job to absolve the consequences.

You were looking forward to a calm reasoned discussion? Since when has that ever been your style?


1. If this is true why do you continually mock trans people by floating asinine ideas of what you can "choose" to identify as on any given day?


2. None of what I am saying here is new to you. You know very well from previous posts on this child that the signs started at two and the decision to let the child live as the gender she self-identifies as was not taken lightly and took place over the course of several years. Once upon a time I offered to meet you in person to discuss the reality of what that family endured since you claimed I was making up things. That was before I knew you were a simple troll. You call it a lifestyle choice. But when I ask you WHY anyone would CHOOSE to live that way, you go brain dead. You are not capable of rationalizing WHY anyone WOULD choose to live that way, but are steadfast in believing it is a choice (remember that whole discussion on cognitive dissonance? You're doing it right here. If you reject this, prove me wrong.)


The rest of your ramblings here just get dumb. A person cannot "identify" as blind. You can accept that a serial killer may show signs early in life, that maybe they are born that way, but LGBT people are making a choice (in consistent numbers across all races, religions and social classes). Why? You will never answer. You don't do answers.


The concept of a biological male self identifying as a woman is extreme? It's actually quite common. This is not to say they look down and think their parts are not what they are. They feel they were born with the wrong parts. In their brain, they are a woman (or should have been). This is their reality. You CHOOSE not to accept it as legitimate, but admit you do not actually know any trans people and have rejected any action which might possibly give you any cause to alter your preconceived perceptions. You reject facts without openly challenging them. Nothing changes with you.

---