Quote:I never disputed the idea that same sex attraction was not intrinsic and sincere. Your position is that because it is intrinsic and sincere that it should be expressed and accepted as part of someone's truthor self.


I simply pointed out other forms of intrinsic sincere forms of attraction.


If new information, counter to the moral construct of two spiritedness, causes you mental stress then... You get the idea.

What you are doing is lumping in gays and trans people with all manner of sexual deviations (i.e.- pedophilia, incest, rape) and they are NOT related. Bringing in these unrelated and truly offensive comparisons shows your lack of ability to face the questions on the how and the why head on.


My position is they do not have a choice in the matter. They are biologically born that way. WHY SHOULDN'T IT BE ACCEPTED AS LEGITIMATE WITH RESPECT TO THEIR SELF IDENTITY? (for real. Why not? Can your moral barometer allow you to answer this one without meltdown?)


Your position is.. that may be true, but in order for me to accept that they are born that way and NOT worthy of discrimination, I would need to also accept all manner of pedophiles, rapists, etc. It's a manure argument.


They are UNRELATED.


Keep in mind, EVERY other species on the planet displays similar behavior. Why do you hold gay frogs and ducks to a different standard?

---