Quote:Close your eyes. What do you see. That's how much i value your perceptions.


You're a naturalist. You think that if anything can be explained by a "biological explanation" then that means that it should be accepted as a part of who someone is.


Nevermind the fact that there are certain psychological disorders that have genetic precursors, that's too easy.


One of the first ittirations of Heart surgery was to correct a naturally occurring genetic defect in the aortic arch. Since this had a biological explanation should we have just sat back as a society and let these kids die while we bloviate about how they must have been sent as messangers from God about how short life is and that we should enjoy it? If i have a tumor caused by a genetic deformation does that mean that i shouldn't seek treatment.


Just because something biologically doesn't mean that it is beneficial or healthy.


As for your whole inability to reconcile that you have relieved yourself in whole or in part based on the fantasies of another man... I'm sorry it's so hard for you bruh. It takes time. but one day... maybe you can live your truth!

As expected.. you missed about half of what I said.


I carefully read your responses (you should try that) and did not see where you reference same sex attraction as a psychological abnormality anywhere (is that what you are doing now?). First you posed the idea they were doing it as a choice (for attention --mostly). Then you talked about brain structure. I never attributed homosexuality to trauma and alluded to SOME pedophiles as being possibly explained by undergoing that traumatic experience.


You introduce a female praying mantis which has NOTHING TO DO with the statement I made that pretty much all animals have been documented displaying homosexual or bisexual behavior. It's not the first time you have taken something completely out of context and added a comment that makes no [BLEEP] sense as a retort. At this moment however, I am secretly wishing you married a praying mantis. So there's that.


I said your "moral impediment tells you sexuality (gay or straight) is not a normal, healthy part of a persons personality." Your rant afterwards is so far off base I wonder what nerve I struck. I am talking about the self realization about one's attractions, not boinking on a train or in math class. Or sexual positions.. I was solely referencing a persons sense of self with respect to their sexuality, not any actions taken because of it. If that's what I was saying.. you'd know. (on second thought.. you probably wouldn't.) I'm not being childish by calling you repressed. Your own words admit it. Don't get your panties twisted because you came clean about it. It's part of who you are. Maybe you'll be nominated for a Darwin Award some day.


I never endorsed the idea of polygamy or sleeping around. I agree monogamy is healthy. I also know it's extremely rare for brides to be virigins and that even the most devout religious congregations are filled with sexually active teens and adulterous spouses. That was my only point (though you'll challenge that too I am sure.)


I don't necessarily feel teenagers should be engaged in sexual activity. I simply stated they are. Your morality prevented you from getting your first nut at 14. Not everyone has that same sense of guilt when offered that opportunity at such a young age. I also feel teaching your children to be smart and safe and OVERALL to respect their own bodies is a healthier method of raising them to be self-aware of their sexuality, but you likely prescribe to the "only and not until marriage plan." I won't bore you with statistics of how people who identify as Christians are the leading contributors to teen pregnancy because the abstinence model has been proven ineffective time and time again. You cannot curb sexual desire by whacking a teen boys winky with a ruler every time it fills with blood to get large. Educating them is far more effective. But I know you disagree.


I will sum up with the following.. I posted a link and asked if you rejected its validity. Predictably you didn't answer. It is a yes or no question.


I also pointed out that pretty much every other species on the planet has displayed homosexual or bisexual tendencies as supportive of a biological explanation. Do you reject this as well? Again.. yes or no is all you need to say.


I also posed the theory that pedophilia is NOT biological in nature and is a mental disorder. Do you agree with this? Yes or no?


You do a magnificent job of not answering questions while introducing all manner of [BLEEP] that is not relevant. I used to think this was because you were a troll. Maybe that is the reason. But the more I see your patterns of dodging the questions you don't like or taking benign statements and twisting them into something completely unrelated, the more I think it may be a defense mechanism for your fragile psyche to not allow anything through which might shatter that false perception you have on the real world.


I do not reject that some psychological disorders can have genetic precursors... but SHOW ME where that has been linked to LGBT if your are going to make that leap? I have read far more on the subject than you have (that is obvious) and have never seen that link.


This is what you do. I could say.. that crater was made by an asteroid that fell to earth and you introduce something like.. are you saying aliens couldn't have come to our planet for an interstellar golf tournament and created divots? You reject any possible, logical solution and introduce something which may or may not have validity AND NEVER PROVIDE ANY SUPPORTIVE EVIDENCE to back that claim.


The closest you can come to refuting the data I have provided on LGBT being biological is .. just because it's biological, doesn't make it right. Again.. you are so hung up on the morality of the issue, you cannot accept what is and what isn't. Hardly the only reason you are unbearable.

---