Quote:1. You yourself said that you believe it has to do with brain structure. That's pretty damning to your credibility.


2. You still cling to the idea that if something can be explained by genetic anomaly that it is healthy. That's faulty logic. Again you refuse to answer the direct question if a child exhibited a disorder or illness predicated on genetic pre-determination would you then seek treatment?


3. Your rationalization of same-sex attraction as worthy of acceptance based on biological predetermination falls apart when we recognize our biological predetermination can be flawed and unhealthy.

1. I have been pretty consistent on stating I believe it to be biological. I linked to articles that support the reason why. I did also mention some hypothesize that it has to do with brain structure. Those studies are less conclusive.


2. This is your personal moral dilemma rearing its head again. If you claim your morality is based on religious indoctrination, why do you choose to believe God makes mistakes? I am not looking at the right or wrong of it. Just what it is. Genetic anomalies can be anything from red hair to being left handed, but because I provide explanations that show the likelihood that LGBT is also genetic, you are forced to place an additional set of guidelines around what you will accept. I don't do that. Your follow up question references a disorder linked to a genetic predetermination. I have not referenced that. You tried to, but provided no plausible evidence of it existing outside of your opinion. If you want me to answer that question you will have to explain where it occurs with respect to being LGBT. I also find it hysterical that you are trying to play the "you won't answer my questions card" when you have never seen a question you couldn't ignore. Even those confusing yes/no ones. You are the undisputed king of unanswered questions.


3. That sure sounds a lot like your personal opinion.

---