Quote:LOL, you asked, and I pointed out something that you ignored. You would have continued to ignore it, unless I called it out. But whatever... It's all good. You have your own blind spot. I'm sure I have mine.


Though I cannot remember the last time you mentioned something that I said that you could despute. Where as I've provided many instances where your bias has been flat out wrong.


And let me do it again right here...


"Although the nominal value of the minimum wage was increased by $5.65 (from $1.60 to $7.25) between 1968 and 2009, these legislated adjustments did not enable the minimum wage to keep pace with the increase in consumer prices, so the real minimum wage fell." <a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42973.pdf'>https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42973.pdf</a>


I know that badger is gonna freak out that I'm providing facts with a cited source. But guess what-- facts determine what is real and what isn't.


You and Oface are the same poster with differing ideologies. Both of you take bits and pieces of the truth to skew reality in order for it to fit your own pre-conceived world view. You know some things and then you leave out other things in order to make your point.


Oface does it for climate change, you do it for all things "conservative". It's rather sad, but easily debunked. I did it to you as well in terms of "taxes" and the administrative cost to a business.


I'm doing it to you again here with the minimum wage. The real value of the minimum wage has decreased dramatically over time. Productivity and profits of business has increased over time. Deal with the facts, my friend. Supply side economics does not work.


I'm gonna start calling you jj-face...