Quote:I know it doesn't work as cleanly as it should, but an evenly distributed top 100 would have 14 WR in it if we are assuming every teams predominant offense runs 3 WR...which isn't true cause some teams base has a FB or 2 TE so it should probably be like 10-12.


Even if a particular top 100 is skewed toward more WR than it should, I don't think Hurns is ever going to essentially be a top half WR1.


I still don't get how me saying he's not at that level is knocking him...he's perfectly good for what he is and saying he doesn't break the top 6.7% of players in a league that has 1,472 active players every week isn't saying he sucks whatsoever.