Quote:From a purely biological spectrum, red hair is neutral in a human beings ability to pass along their genetic material. Same sex attraction or ambiguation of gender does. Based on an evolutionary definition that would make it unhealthy.


Also, in the case of genetic deformity we know what a healthy physiology looks like and as much as possible we strive to help people become healthy. This idea of promoting and celebrating the deformation as something to be encouraged is sad.

 

So..  based on the evolutionary definition, being LGBT is unhealthy because same sex couples cannot procreate.    Technically they can, and I know a lot of them who tried to fit in that box people like you would prefer them to live in and had kids before making the self realization the reason they couldn't make their marriage work was because they were gay.  

 

So aside from the fact that they are attracted to sexual partners who cannot make babies with them, how else is a teenager who makes the self discovery that they are gay physically limited?

 

I'm not promoting being LGBT?  How could I?  "Hey!  Have you tried the gays?"  I am promoting the idea that they are born a certain way and that you might be able to grasp the concept as to why..  then you can be what they call "understanding" of their situation, much like you would be understanding of a person with a deformity (since you are conditioned to always align being LGBT with the most horrible thing imaginable).  I am promoting the concept of being accepting of what they are and go through and why.  

 

But your indoctrination at an early age has created a mental block.  You cannot accept a natural explanation which you might be sympathetic towards an LGBT person like you would be towards someone born with leukemia or cancer.  

 

Name me a single genetic anomaly you treat with the same level of disdain and disgust like you do this one?  You can't. And worse, you can't explain why.  

---