Quote:It is biological because it exists in the embryonic cells and is hereditary. If environment influences tendencies which are already imprinted on a person's DNA months before it leaves the womb, what is the balance? Is it 50% biology and 50% environment? I am not discounting that family structure and dysfunction can have an influence on whether or not a person is LGBT. I accept that there exist social factors which can influence gender identity and gender roles, but to what degree I can't say. My belief is that the larger piece of the puzzle rests with the biological makeup.

Finally.


Read back in the thread and then read this. You have lambasted people for suggesting its more than just biological. You told me it was "absolutely absurd".


"My position is they do not have a choice in the matter. They are biologically born that way."


"So let me try again. When two female monkeys start rubbing their hoo-hahs together in an act of lesbian sex.. when two male lions couple with zero chance of passing on their genetic code.. is it biological or psychological? Why are humans different?"


"Study after study shows the biological explanation is the most widely accepted reason a person is LGBT. Study after study shows pedophilia is most likely explained as a mental disorder or due to brain structure"


These are quotes from you. I'm glad you've finally came to your senses after many words debating that it is a biological explanation.

---