Quote:lol.  Now that's funny.  

 

The legal rationale for slavery was whether or not, in the eyes of the law, all men (and women) were equal before the law and the universality of the endowment by the creator espoused by Jefferson.  The recognition that all men are created equal was an essential part of the rationale behind the 13th 14th 15th amendments to the constitution as well as the subsequent civil rights acts of both the 19th and 20th centuries respectively.  

 

 

Jim Crow, Dredd Scott, property rights and the civil war...  Not particularly in that order.

 

Now look at Roe V Wade and the discussion of personhood.  Sorry, it's 2 different things.  If you want to litigate the so called "republican party" and Lincoln, fine.  Create a thread.

 

But the fact is that property rights and personhood are different.  It's muddying the waters, which you are keen at doing in order to not allow the facts to persist.  But as a libertarian, the concept of Slavery and the concept of Abortion are 2 different things.

 

Sorry that you are too much of a bleeding heart liberal to realize the differences.  But that's not really my fault.  That's on you.\

 

The fetus is not property.  The fetus is not a "slave" or a thing that is looked down upon based on color.  The discussion of abortion is based on personhood and personhood alone---along with other things...  But for libertarians, it's about personhood.  The law matters here.

 

The garbage you like to do is the "well what about..." non-sense.  Take your junk elsewhere.

 

Slavery and Abortion are not the same.  But go on and bleed away, with your heart on your sleeve.  You big softy.

---