Quote:Jim Crow, Dredd Scott, property rights and the civil war... Not particularly in that order.


Now look at Roe V Wade and the discussion of personhood. Sorry, it's 2 different things. If you want to litigate the so called "republican party" and Lincoln, fine. Create a thread.


But the fact is that property rights and personhood are different. It's muddying the waters, which you are keen at doing in order to not allow the facts to persist. But as a libertarian, the concept of Slavery and the concept of Abortion are 2 different things.


Sorry that you are too much of a bleeding heart liberal to realize the differences. But that's not really my fault. That's on you.\


The fetus is not property. The fetus is not a "slave" or a thing that is looked down upon based on color. The discussion of abortion is based on personhood and personhood alone---along with other things... But for libertarians, it's about personhood. The law matters here.


The garbage you like to do is the "well what about..." non-sense. Take your junk elsewhere.


Slavery and Abortion are not the same. But go on and bleed away, with your heart on your sleeve. You big softy.

Judgment reversed and suit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

1. Persons of African descent cannot be, nor were ever intended to be, citizens under the U.S. Const. Plaintiff is without standing to file a suit.


That's from the holding decision in dress Scott. As you can see, there was a legal rationale based on the ancestry of Africans to rationalize disenfranchising them of basic rights.


Its the same with the legal rationalization to deprive the unborn of the right to exist.


Moreover, its intilectually dishonest to deify the rationalization of personhood. Its a pseudo intilectually concept that has no root in the actual constitution.


You also failed to acknowledge that you were wrong about the holding opinion of roe v. Wade.

---