Quote:Yeah.... OK.

Seeing the flaw in your twisted sense of logic isn't "being emotional"

If I were emotional I wouldn't be so bored with your inability to see (admit) your mistake.

But I am.

 

The problem you're having is your emotion is stopping you from admitting that the statement I made earlier is correct.

 

My argument: "Gus has shown that he can't scheme a defense better than the great Mike Mularky could. Thus he's on the Mike Mularky level."

 

Your argument: "Gus has shown that he can't scheme a defense better than the great Mike Mularky could. Thus we can draw no conclusions about Gus's ability to scheme a defense compared with Mike Mularky."

 

You're asserting that the first part of the statement is wrong, while it's already proven through simple statistics. Your emotional desire to hang on to what you want to be the case is what's causing your second statement (we can't draw conclusions from the concrete results) and also causing you to cling to it instead of accepting you're wrong.

---