On the hypo basis that it were possible id take Carr and Mack. 

 

Carr imo wouldnt have cost us games like Bortles did. Less pick6s , lass self sacking, less fumbles and less bad decisions against better defenses. Bortles only had 3 more TD with better weapons and Carr was only 13 yards away from 4k. Carr is the smarter more consistent Qb though he does lack some of bortles athletic ability. Bortles was the direct reason we lost multiple games despite his higher number of yards and TDs. 

 

Bortles isnt lightyears ahead of Carr by any stretch as both showed great improvement over their rookie years. 

 

When you add in Lee vs Mack it gets insanely over matched. We'd still have a top 10 QB with what might be the best defensive player in the league. We'd have not only won but dominated the division. We had a perfect storm of facing depleted teams and backup qbs Mack would feast and Carr with our weapons (Hurns, Arob , Thomas ) vs weaker defenses (KC and Denver have great Ds vs Tenn,Indy lol) would have been a cake walk to winning the AFC South. 

---