Quote:You said it wasn't ACTUAL discrimination. I'm saying it is discrimination the man can't put on a pair of eyes and all of the sudden have access to the drive-thru. On the surface it's absolutely ridiculous he's suing McDonald's over this I agree, but when we've established as a society that inclusion is going to be mandatory then why do we all find it ridiculous this man wants inclusion?


someone early said this is like the no shirt, no shoes situation where he can still be reasonably accommodated, but I thought about it more and the no shirt no shoes isn't the same. Anyone can put on a pair of shoes or a shirt and get service, this man can't put on a pair of eyes. Because of his disability he's excluded, that's discrimination.


My point isn't to argue that McDonald's should be forced to do something about this, my point is that attempting to correct discrimination at the state level leads to all kinds of problems. It's just an illustration of why I'm against "discrimination laws" not because I support discrimination, but because it's a private property rights issue.