Quote:Where this guy originated from is irrelevant to my point.  He was radicalized here.  But, you're inviting radicals into this country under the guise of being "refugees" as part of a larger population of migrants, you're opening the door to more of these types of attacks.  Where they were born is irrelevant.  They're radicals.  We're letting them in through the front door.

 

I know you want to defend your president on this, but ISIS has already indicated they will be exporting radicals among those "refugees", and once they're inside the borders of the United States, there's NOTHING to stop them from going wherever they please to do whatever they've been trained to do.

 

Keep spouting the talking points.  Tell us about that huge ammo clip he was using.  You're only exposing your ignorance here. 

As I read it,you are saying that it is a subset of the immigrants that may have already been radicalized, and are a risk.  I  imagine you would agree that there have been cases of suburban Americans from much less 'radical' backgrounds wanting to go jihadi joe. I am pretty sure it wouldn't be incredibly difficult for ISIS to put out a press release saying we are going to start sneak folks in from everywhere. Seems to me there is some risk involving anyone immigrating to this country. Are you advocating a complete ban on immigration? I don't think so, but you did say in a prior post that proper vetting was impossible. So if proper vetting is impossible, how can any immigration by anyone occur? Or in post 7 were you talking specifically about vetting for 3 months versus another unspecified form of vetting? 

---