Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good?

#45

Quote:Do you like making things up?

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/pittsburgh-steelers-opinions-reactions-news-updates/2016/3/17/11248546/kelvin-beachum-is-still-a-great-story-no-matter-who-he-plays-for'>http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/pittsburgh-steelers-opinions-reactions-news-updates/2016/3/17/11248546/kelvin-beachum-is-still-a-great-story-no-matter-who-he-plays-for</a>


There was not one negative comment made in the entire article or in the comments section. The majority of Steelers fans were sad to see him go.


Beachum may not be the next Johnathan Ogden but he doesn't have to be. He just needs to be serviceable and add stability to the O-Line. If he's plays great then he'll be getting a nice check after we pick up his option. If not, no harm no foul. Big Ben experienced career lows in sacks when Beachum was starting. Is that just coincidence?
Yep, making it up...come on now. The article you linked even states that Big Ben's sack percentage improved when Beach was replaced with the ex-Army Ranger Villanueva. As for majority sad to see him go, there are people on this board now still crying about Monroe being replaced. That dude just got booted from the Ravens and will be sitting on his thumbs until someone gets injured. Does nobody question why the Steelers didn't offer Beach a high dollar contract? I mean PFF ranked him top 10. LOL. Why did the Jags only sign him on a one year deal?

 

From Steelerdepot.com:

 

"I understand LT is a premium position and Beach is the third best OL the team has."

 

"There is absolutely zero chance that the Steelers will hand this stiff $8-$9 million per year. If he hits the open market tell me one team that would pay him anything close to that. You are essentially negotiating against yourself with this guy. If   I'm the Steelers, I make him a take-it-or-leave-it offer...$4-$5 million per year with a $3 million signing bonus. Watch him get bulldozed against the Ravens in that playoff game and tell me this bum is worth $9 million per year."

 

"Although I agree with you about Beachum being at worst a average left tackle. I definitely feel like we should give him a take it or leave it deal. IMO Beachum, Gilbert and Worilds were or are all average players for us that deserve take it or leave it deals."

 

"If you read the comment in relation to the thread? I stipulated that it would require specific circumstances for me to not worry about letting Beachum go.

That being said, I like Beach, but anyone with half an objective bone in his body can see he has some serious holes in his game. Like I said, I think he's at least an average OT, I'm just not totally convinced he's better than that yet."

 

Look, I get it, people are desperate for a LT, but the blind optimism is scary, especially when facts are staring them in the face. Meh.

[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by knarnn - 06-16-2016, 09:07 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Yo Boy - 06-16-2016, 09:41 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by knarnn - 06-16-2016, 10:35 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Jags02 - 06-17-2016, 04:08 AM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Jags02 - 06-17-2016, 07:57 AM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Joe - 06-17-2016, 09:27 AM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by knarnn - 06-17-2016, 02:14 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by B2hibry - 06-17-2016, 03:48 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by knarnn - 06-17-2016, 04:21 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by no1jag - 06-17-2016, 04:24 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by paksat - 06-17-2016, 05:45 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Dakota - 06-17-2016, 07:16 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by knarnn - 06-18-2016, 05:46 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Yo Boy - 06-18-2016, 11:38 PM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Jags02 - 06-22-2016, 10:51 AM
Joeckel this bad or Fowler that good? - by Adub28 - 06-22-2016, 05:04 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!