Quote:I understand but the same argument can be made for the 1st Amendment. They didn't know someone could one day hold as much influence as many media outlets do. The point is that the Bill of Rights should be unwavering. Their intent is clear and the rights they provide are too.

The media back then influenced as well. But not to the extent it does today. I agree with you. Sadly, the media could be controlled somewhat if people weren't sheep and thought for themselves and now more than ever, do research.

In today's politics, if lies were enforced, the slander courts would be full. But , then again, the one doing the slandering just claims ignorance.

I'm of the belief the framers would be raising more of an eye brow today over the 2nd vs the 1st. Lies and influence was alive and well then. Muskets however, had far outgrown their usage.

---