Quote:Its funny how liberals are so worried about division on the republican side. Its almost like they care. Once again I stand by my prediction, a record primary for Trump versus a poorer showing than last time for Hillary doesn't spell democrat victory. You can throw as many abc polls saying Hilliarys ahead, but I guarantee the sampling/populations are off. Just like Romneys sampling for Obama was off and he lost. The same people are not all gonna vote for Hillary or come out for her like they did for Obama, they already proved it in the primary when she got less votes than she did last time. Whereas Trump has resulted in a massive increase in the Republican primary from previously untapped constituents. If you are polling based on who came out in 2012, you will be wrong, its gonna be a different crowd this time. Its possible Hilliary could win, but I doubt it seeing as they barely won the last election with a much more popular candidate against a stooge.

 

You only get one chance to make a first impression - and Trump blew his chance.

 

Believe it or not many people haven't paid a lot of attention yet, and won't until closer to election day. They've formed an opinion re Hillary. Probably did so years ago. All they know about Trump is that he seems to be a blowhard racist. I know, I know - the theory is that "they" are going to come down from the mountains, pour out of the bars and trailer parks and nursing homes and vote for Donbo in record numbers. That's asking a lot.

 

I don't think (hope) that Clinton will select Elizabeth (national nanny) Warren. I suspect it will be someone from a swing state, i.e., Virginia or Ohio.

 

And if you see Romney as a "stooge" what is another rich, white guy from the northeast? Stooge + ? (And Obama didn't "barely win". Do you understand the Electoral College?)

---