Quote:Sex ed - The right advocates that it belongs in the home. 

Contraceptives - condoms cost a freaking quarter at most

Aid to poor families - We already give away billions from the government in addition to the billions more given voluntarily.

 

So, since people can't be responsible we should instead allow them to commit murder. Let's just make all the rest of crime legal too, it's no different. 

When you argue from a disingenuous position it's hard to take you seriously. 

 

They advocate against children being taught sex education as well as contraceptive methods (which actually works). Instead, they advocate for the complete failure of a program in abstinence only education. If people actual taught sex ed to their kids we would not have sex ed being taught in schools at all and you know it. 

 

We already give away money and the right wants to take it away because they are lazy moochers. Don't pretend that's not the desire of the right. 

 

I have not argued either for or against abortion at all in this. All I am doing is pointing why it's hard to take bro-birthers seriously when they are actual things they can support that would aid in their intended mission of "less abortions". In addition to support after birth. It's not about life, it's about birth. They chose to not do those things and instead advocate policies that have the exact opposite effect. Seriously it's not hard... Advocate for contraceptive option availability, advocate for sex ed. You can still want no abortions, that's entirely understandable. 

---