Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook'>http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook</a>


What you just said would constitute a criminal violation of section 793(f) title 18 of the federal penal code.


Moreover, the moment the server was used for work related matters, the entire server became part of the public record. The idea that she and her lawyers could go through and delete emails before the feds had a chance to review it is a complete castration of the federal records keeping act.

*Shrug*

 

I'll take the decision of the FBI director, who has sworn an oath to defend the constitution of the United States of America, over the partisan operatives at National Review.

 

That opinion is that no reasonable prosecutor would take this case based on the evidence uncovered, which, by the way, was not revealed to you, me, or National Review.

 

jj, there's plenty of meat out there for you and the other right wingers to gnaw on.  The director laid out a scathing criticism of the actions of the State Department, and those critiques are now going to be used by Republicans for the next 4 months.  What I won't believe, or accept, is that Comey is acting under partisan principles or is incompetent because he made a decision that you and others that endorse your agenda don't like - for your own partisan reasons.

---